Observed settings and classified photography genres from public portfolios of professional photographers.
Current dataset
Sample and data quality
Photographs
2,624
Professional photographers
39
Public albums
163
Settings completeness
100.0%
The largest contributor accounts for 28.8% of this sample.
Status: strong.
These are observations, not recommendations or universal usage estimates.
Observed dates span 2011-12-31 to
2025-02-23.
Data summary
Key observations
The sample contains 2,624 photographs from 39 professional photographers across 163 public albums.
ISO 801–1,600 has the highest ISO photo count, while ISO 201–400 has the largest photographer-balanced share.
These are observed metadata patterns, not recommended settings.
Observed settings
Settings distributions
Bars show photo-weighted frequency. The table separates photo counts from photographer-balanced share.
Photographer-balanced share gives every professional photographer equal total influence
across a distribution, then reports the percentage assigned to each bucket. This reduces the effect of
unusually large portfolios.
ISO
ISO 50 or lower34
ISO 51–10069
ISO 101–200282
ISO 201–400540
ISO 401–800532
ISO 801–1,600578
ISO 1,601–3,200466
ISO 3,201–6,400102
ISO 6,401–12,80016
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns.
ISO distribution data
Bucket
Photos
Professional photographers
Photographer-balanced share
ISO 50 or lower
34
6
0.8%
ISO 51–100
69
13
1.3%
ISO 101–200
282
28
13.1%
ISO 201–400
540
29
24.0%
ISO 401–800
532
30
19.6%
ISO 801–1,600
578
30
19.3%
ISO 1,601–3,200
466
29
17.6%
ISO 3,201–6,400
102
17
3.8%
ISO 6,401–12,800
16
5
0.5%
Aperture
f/1.4128
f/1.856
f/240
f/2.8387
f/3.2192
f/3.5233
f/4416
f/4.5168
f/5193
f/5.6168
f/6.3117
f/7.189
f/8101
f/973
f/1044
f/1142
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns.
Aperture distribution data
Bucket
Photos
Professional photographers
Photographer-balanced share
f/1.4
128
3
0.7%
f/1.8
56
6
0.5%
f/2
40
8
1.0%
f/2.8
387
26
16.3%
f/3.2
192
19
4.1%
f/3.5
233
21
8.2%
f/4
416
27
23.6%
f/4.5
168
23
5.2%
f/5
193
22
5.8%
f/5.6
168
27
11.6%
f/6.3
117
21
3.7%
f/7.1
89
18
3.1%
f/8
101
16
3.6%
f/9
73
16
2.8%
f/10
44
14
1.2%
f/11
42
14
1.3%
Shutter speed
1/2048 s139
1/1625 s93
1/1290 s79
1/1024 s175
1/813 s137
1/645 s145
1/512 s220
1/406 s142
1/323 s143
1/256 s234
1/203 s188
1/161 s134
1/128 s189
1/102 s85
1/81 s65
1/64 s81
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns.
Shutter speed distribution data
Bucket
Photos
Professional photographers
Photographer-balanced share
1/2048 s
139
16
7.9%
1/1625 s
93
19
7.4%
1/1290 s
79
19
3.3%
1/1024 s
175
25
8.7%
1/813 s
137
24
8.1%
1/645 s
145
20
5.5%
1/512 s
220
19
3.8%
1/406 s
142
20
4.3%
1/323 s
143
18
3.5%
1/256 s
234
19
6.2%
1/203 s
188
17
3.2%
1/161 s
134
19
5.4%
1/128 s
189
17
5.6%
1/102 s
85
17
2.8%
1/81 s
65
16
1.9%
1/64 s
81
20
3.5%
Focal length
14 mm35
16 mm57
20 mm114
24 mm559
32 mm30
35 mm52
38 mm31
50 mm127
70 mm167
85 mm36
160 mm28
200 mm265
300 mm114
400 mm32
500 mm54
600 mm30
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns.
Focal length distribution data
Bucket
Photos
Professional photographers
Photographer-balanced share
14 mm
35
8
1.6%
16 mm
57
9
1.2%
20 mm
114
6
0.7%
24 mm
559
22
11.2%
32 mm
30
9
0.4%
35 mm
52
15
2.1%
38 mm
31
10
0.6%
50 mm
127
17
4.7%
70 mm
167
19
5.5%
85 mm
36
9
2.1%
160 mm
28
9
1.2%
200 mm
265
22
9.4%
300 mm
114
15
5.5%
400 mm
32
11
8.5%
500 mm
54
10
8.2%
600 mm
30
8
3.3%
35mm-equivalent focal length
14 mm35
16 mm57
20 mm114
24 mm559
27 mm27
32 mm31
35 mm49
38 mm33
50 mm127
70 mm166
85 mm36
200 mm262
300 mm92
400 mm32
500 mm54
600 mm30
Swipe the table sideways to see all columns.
35mm-equivalent focal length distribution data
Bucket
Photos
Professional photographers
Photographer-balanced share
14 mm
35
8
1.6%
16 mm
57
9
1.2%
20 mm
114
6
0.7%
24 mm
559
22
11.3%
27 mm
27
12
0.6%
32 mm
31
10
0.5%
35 mm
49
14
1.6%
38 mm
33
11
1.1%
50 mm
127
17
4.7%
70 mm
166
19
5.5%
85 mm
36
9
2.1%
200 mm
262
22
9.3%
300 mm
92
15
3.9%
400 mm
32
11
8.5%
500 mm
54
10
8.2%
600 mm
30
8
3.3%
Classified photography genres
Genre associations come from deterministic public album-name classification.